« The Death of Traditional Book Publishing | Main | Unsubscribe Me! »

Tuesday, December 13, 2005

More Thoughts on the Future of Book Publishing

By the comments I have received to my last post, I think it might be helpful to clarify a few items.

First, despite my attention-grabbing title, I do not actually anticipate the death of traditional book publishing—at least not anytime soon. However, even a 5-10 percent reduction in sales would have a significant negative impact on the publishing industry as we know it today.

Remember, legally downloaded music sales are only 6% of the total music industry, yet the record companies are reeling. But, it’s only going to get worse for those who refuse to embrace the future. Consider the fact that total music sales (physical and downloaded) for the first half of 2005 were $13.2 billion. Legal downloads accounted for $790 million or nearly 6 percent of this total. However, download sales increased by 350% over the prior year. This is the really big news. Do you see where this trend is going?

Yes, traditional books will be available to bibliophiles for the foreseeable future. All I am arguing is that a shift will occur. A big enough slice of the book reading public will opt for digital delivery and that will have a significant, disruptive effect on the entire industry. Trust me, it won’t take much. This is not an industry awash in profits. A 5-10 percent reduction in sales would wreak havoc. It’s already happening with newspapers and magazines. On the other hand, publishing companies that anticipate this shift and prepare accordingly will prosper. But this must happen now, not after the shift occurs. By then, it will be too late.

Second, I don’t think it’s valid to argue that the current technology doesn’t replicate the user-interface of a traditional book. This is obvious—and irrelevant. Technology is changing exponentially. We are not that far away from displays that closely resemble paper and are more readable and easy on the eyes than paper. We can’t try to envision the future by merely extrapolating from the present. We have to think “outside the box.”

Similarly, we can’t afford to make the mistake of assuming that what is familiar to us will be familiar to our children and grandchildren. Yes, I too love books. I have rooms full of them. (That’s one of the reasons I got into the book business!) But my daughters are more comfortable with computers. Just walk into a room full of teenagers and watch what they are doing. You won’t find many reading books (to my dismay). They are more comfortable with computers and other electronic devices. That’s really all they have known.

In addition, the technology does not have to be better than the traditional book. The quality of MP3 files is not as good as the quality of CD tracks. Yet, customers are switching in unprecedented numbers. Why? Because MP3 (or AAC) is good enough. In addition, iPods offer something intangible. It is something that delights consumers and makes them feel hip and powerful. The thought of having 10,000 songs at your fingertips in a device that can fit in your pocket is intoxicating—at least to millions of people. All I am arguing is that a similar device will come along that makes books as readily accessible—and as fun—as an iPod does for music. It will be cool beyond what we can imagine today. It will be simple and elegant, and, like iTunes and iPod, provide a seamless, end-to-end solution that doesn’t exist in today’s eBook world.

Third, Amazon.com has proven that millions of consumers are willing to buy books online without the benefit of browsing through a physical copy in a retail store. No, this doesn’t mean that retail bookstores will go away. But they will have to prepare to compete with a new kind of online store (think iTunes) that will give them a run for their money. Five years ago, no one could have imagined a new startup competitor who could sell more music than either Tower Records or Borders. Yet, it happened. Seemingly, out of the blue. And it is growing beyond what anyone, perhaps even Apple, could have imagined.

Finally, I want to thank everyone who commented on my last post. I may well be wrong in the particulars of my vision about the future. All I am hoping to do is stimulate discussion and get us thinking about a change I believe is inevitable.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

December 13, 2005 at 02:13 PM in Books, Cool Gadgets, iPod/iTunes, Web/Tech | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/24762/3882132

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Thoughts on the Future of Book Publishing:

Comments

Books are here to stay. Hey, the Lamb's Book of Life (it has pages with writing) will be there for ETERNITY. That said, I think the future will be about the delivery of printed books, not the medium. POD (print on demand) and a faster internet could eventually displace the entire offset printing industry, and make printed book publishing accessible and affordable to every author. The future is not about limiting printed books to digital delivery, but about expanding books' availability and delivery in all forms (print, digital, audio, whatever). We now burn our own music CDs and movie DVDs, and we develop and print our own photos, all in the comfort of our home and unimagined a decade ago. I think it is perfectly reasonable to think we should also be able to print our own bound books at home, too. I'm convinced we will see a home publishing printer that will deliver a fully bound printed book in various trims and in color (ie, POD Home Edition). I didn't believe all the hype and hoodoo about the "paperless office" back in the early days of computing, and I don't buy the talk about the death of printed books now. Sure, technology and capitalism will give us lots of new gadgets and gizmos for digital delivery of books (or whatever they will be called, since the format will no longer be tied to pages). However, rather than decrease print output, I think the volume of printed books will increase exponentially. Just watch.

Posted by: Clay | Dec 19, 2005 11:08:39 PM

One thing bothers me about these electronic prognostications. They depend on electricity.
Perhaps one should factor in the potential availability of simple power and consider over strained and aging power plants, depleted fossil fuels and all that stuff before assuming the present level will be maintained.

Posted by: Bernita | Dec 22, 2005 6:56:05 AM

Mr. Hyatt:

I rarely read articles as good as yours about technology. I am surprised that anyone would doubt what you have warned about; of course it is coming, it is only a matter of what it looks like, and I think you have given an excellent vision of this.

I'm a Gen-X engineer, and am shocked by that lack of reality Boomers are willing create. A whole new world is already here. iPods are just the beginning.

Already, I refuse to read anything but the highest quality books and news since I can find exactly what I am looking for using Amazon searches. I always buy online or just inter-library loan. I skim books by the score, scan blogs, and listen to digital books while working around the house. I haven't looked at a newspaper in print format in 5 years and yet read more news and opinion than ever. What amazes me is how much ignorance of the digital divide remains. You, however, have given me hope that at least some folk in the old world do get it :-).

Posted by: M. David | Dec 22, 2005 1:08:08 PM

Whoa, there, M. David! There's no need to get personal with all us obviously troglodyte Luddite "Boomers" inflicted with terminal "lack of reality" who think there will still be plenty of printed books in the future. You obviously found my post above filled with the "ignorance" of an "old world" type who just refuses to "get it." Phew. Was that really necessary, or just the ranting arrogance of unseasoned youth?

Now, to your point. I don't "doubt" what Mr. Hyatt is describing at all, and find his insights helpful and enlightening. He is a whole lot smarter and more informed than I am, which is why I have begun reading this blog. I wasn't disagreeing with Mr. Hyatt so much as I was just interacting with his thoughts. I am an author, a small self-publisher with successful titles, and am published by a major trade publisher. I am a Boomer, and not an engineer, so I must obviously lack any insight into Gen-X and Moasic trends, at least by your standards. I don't have all the toys you have, but I do enjoy digital delivery of many print media (yes, I read my paper online, too...a Boomer even!). I am also considering POD, as well as digital delivery of some of our titles, and doing podcasts, and I have a blog, and yada yada.

My point is NOT that the digital revolution will not change the delivery of books...it obviously will. My point is that the revolution will be about creating MORE means of delivery, not about eliminating printed delivery of books. I genuinely believe that there will be MORE printed books in the future, not less. There will also be MORE digital book media in the future, not less. It will be about INCREASING the options, not limiting them. The offset printing industry will probably be replaced by digital printing (POD), but that will make cheap, quick printed book production available to the masses, and guess what always happens when that happens?

We obviously disagree, but I would just encourage you to lose the attitude toward us "old world" types and just enjoy the discussions.

Posted by: Clay | Dec 22, 2005 4:49:01 PM

I think some of the magazine and newspaper carnage is self inflicted. I subscribed to Macworld magazine for years. Back in the late 80's-early 90's every issue had several multipage editorials and columns and each issue was pretty thick. Now it's half the thickness, costs twice as much, and there's one real editorial and a bunch of tiny snippets and reviews. The content dropped to the level of the digital competition. I prefer the printed page to the screen for an in depth article or column but a half page blurb or a review I'll just catch online. Macworld moved from what worked better on their medium to a dead tree version of their website. So I let my subscription lapse.

Now granted, the tech for displaying pages is going to improve. But I bet there'll still be things paper will do better than electrons. Part of the challenge for publishers will be finding which material works best for each technology.

An aside about iTunes. I never really bought music until iTunes became available. I don't own an MP3 player. What iTunes does for me is it takes the worry out of CDs. I don't have to worry about the disc getting scratched or damaged in use. Instead, I rip the disc, put it in its case, put it away, and forget about it. When I want to hear something I just fire up iTunes and jam (we don't have a stereo anymore, just nice speakers on the computers).

Right now I have four bookshelves loaded with books. It'd be neat to box most of them up without worrying about having something when I need it.

Posted by: Donald H | Apr 29, 2006 7:18:01 AM

Post a comment